All workflows·Workflow — HR

Performance Review Workflow

Turn manager notes and self-assessments into a structured, fair, documented performance review — without the blank-page dread.

Setup time

20 min

One-time

Time saved

2–3 hrs

/review cycle per person

Tools

Claude

Free tier works

Difficulty

Intermediate

No code

Cost · AIM Pro

R299

approx. €16

Once-off to unlock

What this workflow does

Takes raw manager observations, self-assessment notes, and role expectations and produces a structured, balanced performance review: a fair assessment of what was delivered, how it was delivered, where the person excelled, where they need to grow, and what the path forward looks like. It removes the blank-page problem, reduces recency bias, and helps managers write reviews that are useful to the person receiving them — not just a formality.

Who it's for

  • Founders and team leads running their first formal review cycles
  • Managers who find review writing time-consuming and uncomfortable
  • HR consultants helping clients implement a fair, consistent review process
  • Small teams who want a structured process without expensive HR software

Input

Manager notes + self-assessment

Raw observations and role expectations

45 min

Output

Structured performance review

Assessment · strengths · growth · path forward

What you'll need

Claude (preferred)ChatGPTGoogle Docs or Notion

What good looks like

Performance Review — H1 2026

Senior Customer Success Manager

Development Areas

Rating

Meets Expectations

Example output

  • A one-paragraph overall assessment that is honest, specific, and grounded in evidence
  • Three or four strengths described with concrete examples — not generic praise
  • Two or three development areas framed constructively — what to do, not just what's lacking
  • A clear rating or summary verdict that matches the written content
  • A forward-looking section: goals and expectations for the next review period